The methodology behind every AI Product Sprint · interactive workbook
The 6-week playbook I run inside every AI Product Sprint.
Most AI agents look great in a demo and break in production. This is the exact 6-phase methodology I ship inside every AI Product Sprint ($30–60K, 4–6 weeks) — the same playbook behind a Fortune 500 AI contact center (40% CSAT lift) and Workly v1 (vibe-coded in 3 weeks). Architecture, eval suites, cost routing — no slideware, no handoff failures. One Agentic Product Architect, one head, end to end.
Stack: LangGraph · MCP · pgvector · Claude Sonnet/Haiku · GPT-5oAvg. time-to-prod: 6 weeksCost reductions: 40–70%Architect: Solo + Ayraxs bench
The exact 6-phase methodology behind every Sprint, Rescue, and Retainer engagement
Step through all 6 phases below — discovery, architecture, build, eval, deploy, optimize. Read the real Python and YAML snippets I ship inside paying engagements. Download the production spec template instantly. No forms, no email capture, no gatekeeping.
The same template I ship inside an AI Product Sprint ($30–60K): exact config for routing, guards, evaluators.
The diagnostic framework behind every Production Audit ($3,500): the 5 boring failures every failing agent has in common.
The cost-routing snippets that take a $14K LLM bill to $5K in nine days — the recent client case, three lines of code.
Which of the four offers fits you?
Sprint ($30–60K) if building · Audit + Rescue ($3.5K → $25–80K) if failing · Retainer ($15–30K/mo) if scaling · MVP ($15–30K) if validating. 30 min, no sales deck.
No forms. No gatekeeping. Just professional engineering resources.
The 6-phase agent delivery workflow
01
Discovery
WEEK 1
02
Architecture
WEEK 1–2
03
Build
WEEK 2–4
04
Eval & Test
WEEK 3–4
05
Deploy
WEEK 4–5
06
Optimize
WEEK 5+
PHASE 01 — WEEK 1
Discovery — map the agent's job
Before writing a single line of LangGraph code, we define exactly what the agent must do, what it must never do, and how we will measure success. Most failed agent projects skip this and pay for it in week 4.
Before writing a single line of LangGraph code, we define exactly what the agent must do, what it must never do, and how we will measure success.
Every $1 spent on eval upfront saves ~$10 in production debugging.
Proof points
Three production deployments. Same workflow.
These aren't hypothetical case studies. Each one was shipped to production using the exact 6-phase methodology, hitting concrete ROI targets, and delivered with auto-run test suites.
LLM cost optimization
$14K → $5K monthly spend
Series-B SaaS support automation pipeline. Cost slashed by 64%, response latency improved by 28%, and quality maintained flat.
Problem: Single GPT-4o call triggered per ticket, costing $14,000/mo and scaling linearly with user growth.
Approach: Cascading routing (Haiku → Sonnet → Opus), aggressive prompt caching, and semantic cache for high-frequency queries.
Outcome: 62% of queries routed successfully to Haiku ($0.0008/req), 31% to Sonnet, and only 7% escalated to costly models.
LangGraphOpenRouterLangfuseRedis
Multi-agent system
Swarm outreach: 38 → 142 SQLs/mo
B2B services firm. A 4-agent LangGraph swarm replaced their manual SDR research workflows, increasing SQL volume by 3.7x.
Problem: Sales reps spent 60% of their time on repetitive prospect intelligence gathering rather than chatting.
Approach: Supervisor pattern with 4 specialist workers (Researcher, Personalizer, Sender, and CRM Tracker) with a strict Human-In-The-Loop approval gate.
Outcome: Reached 142 qualified meetings/month in under 90 days. Reply rates boosted from 2.1% to 11.3%.
LangGraphClaude SonnetApolloPostgres
Production agent
Support automation: 71% resolve rate
Fintech Tier-1 customer support replacement. Autonomously handles over 71% of tickets end-to-end with 94.2% CSAT score.
Problem: 8,000 monthly tickets scaling customer support costs with an average 22h first-response SLA.
Approach: Agentic RAG over Help Center docs + secure Stripe integration. Self-correction loop handles errors gracefully before escalation.
Outcome: SLA dropped to 47 seconds. Average handler ticket cost cut from $4.20 to $0.31. Four quality regressions caught in CI/CD.
LangGraphPineconeLangSmithStripe API
Next Step
Have an agent in mind? Pick the offer that fits.
Book a 30-minute scoping call. I'll map your business workflow to the 6-phase process, identify high-risk failure modes, and tell you straight which of the four offer tiers fits — Sprint, Audit + Rescue, Retainer, or Vibe-Built MVP. No sales deck. If your situation is buy-not-build, I'll tell you that too.
Four offer tiers · $3.5K Audit · $15–30K MVP · $30–60K Sprint · $15–30K/mo Retainer. Milestone payment, 90-day exits, no long-term lock-in. Currently taking 2 new engagements this quarter.
✦Pricing & Plans
Four Offer Tiers. One Architect.
Below: three of the four. The fourth — Production Audit + Rescue ($3.5K → $25–80K) — is the entry-tier banner above. Pick what matches your situation: validating, building, fixing, or scaling.
For solo founders with an AI idea and no team. Working MVP with real auth, real database, real users — hosted, payment-ready, repo in your GitHub. Not a Streamlit demo. Differentiated by 8 years of design + product chops; my MVPs ship polished, not ugly.
Discovery, spec, architecture, UX, and the build — end to end. Replaces a 4-contractor team ($115K typical) for half the cost, with zero handoff failures. Best for funded founders shipping a real AI product, not slideware. Solo or with Ayraxs talent bench when scope demands.
Senior product leadership for your AI line, without the FTE risk. 2–4 days/week embedded. Replaces a $1.2M/yr Principal PM + Staff Engineer + Lead Designer triad. 14-month average duration; most engagements convert from a Sprint or a Rescue.
✓2–4 days/week embedded
✓Architecture decisions + code review on agents
✓Hands-on builds with Ayraxs bench as needed
✓Weekly written status + monthly reliability report
All engagements are fixed-price after a 20-min scoping call · Milestone-based payment · 90-day exits · Pakistan-based, working globally · Local-market pilot tier available — DM for terms.